In numerous nations, the issue of children becoming overweight and facing health concerns is on the rise. There are varying opinions on whether the government should bear the responsibility for addressing this concern. I believe that while the government can play a role, the responsibility also lies with their families and schools.
Proponents of governmental involvement underscore the significant influence that policies and regulations can wield over public health. Governments possess the authority to institute measures that foster healthier lifestyles among children. For instance, they can establish guidelines mandating schools to offer more nourishing meals, guaranteeing that children are exposed to well-rounded and wholesome diets. Additionally, governments can exert control over the advertising and promotion of unhealthy food products aimed at children, thereby curtailing their exposure to persuasive campaigns that often advocate detrimental dietary practices. All these measures collectively contribute to fostering an environment that not only educates children about the significance of health but also encourages the adoption of healthier choices and behaviors as integral parts of their daily lives.
Nevertheless, placing the entire burden on the government to address this concern is inadequate. Parents and families hold a pivotal position in influencing the dietary preferences and routines of children. It is within their purview to impart knowledge about proper nutrition, involve their children in the process of preparing balanced meals at home, and actively engage them in physical activities, all of which can have a lasting impact on instilling healthy habits early on and preventing the onset of childhood obesity. Furthermore, educational institutions also share a significant responsibility in this matter. Schools can contribute by integrating comprehensive health education into their curriculum, equipping students with the understanding of nutritional values and the consequences of unhealthy eating habits.
In conclusion, while the government does have a role to play in addressing the issue of childhood obesity, it should not bear the sole responsibility. A comprehensive approach involving families, educational establishments, and the authorities is essential to effectively combat this challenge and ensure the well-being of the younger generation.
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills Teachers need to avoid using computers in classroom at all costs and go back to teaching study skills Do you agree or disagree 56
- Online learning is great revolutionary alternative to traditional training Online learning is a form of distance learning that takes place over the Internet including online causes exam gamified quizzes and certification training Some people believe that 67
- The table below gives information about a restaurant s average sales in three different branches in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below gives information about a restaurant s average sales in three different branches in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10029498525 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31910189339 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7504611738 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.866666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147527210662 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533056864873 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377083391993 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986743135906 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04334570045 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.4 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.