In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more available.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvanatages?
In this day and age, fast food joints are ubiquitous and the food is becoming reasonable and accessible to everyone. Although this can be an advantage to some people, I am convinced that it is more detrimental than beneficial to the public.
It is often claimed that the popularity of the fast food is a huge positive point to eaters for one main reason: it is easy to be prepared. Today’s society is full of workers at a fast pace and workaholics; therefore, there is a shortage of time for meal preparation. Making a decent meals in the morning seems not to be a good choice for the hasty employees. Instead, a hamburger or hot dog at a drive-through vain appears to be more ideal in this case. Another situation is that after a tiring day of engrossing work, most people are too exhausted to cook a nutritious dinner. Fast food items are opted for as a perfect alternative. Thus, the fact that this kind of food is widely available and cheap is advantageous to a certain extent.
Nevertheless, we cannot deny the drawbacks of an excessive fast food intake into the body. To begin with, physical and mental health would suffer. According to scientific evidence, consuming a large amount of fast food over a long period of time is the primary cause of chronic bone inflammation and cardiovascular diseases, shortening the patients’ lifetime. In addition, the fast food is heavily addictive, making eaters depend on it during their active intervals. If the addicts do not consume the food when the urge is coming, they cannot focus on task effectively, and thus diminishing labor productivity. Another negative point is that the junk food induces an extravagant expenditure if bought in the long run. It is generally thought that this type of food helps save personal and family budgets as they are at a regular discount. However, the total cost is beyond this since the purchase of the fast food is on a frequent basis, resulting in a prohibitive cost in the end.
In conclusion, the prevalence and inexpensiveness of the fast food cannot compensate for the negative effects they exert on consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
- The graph shows information about technology usage in the UK over time Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others believe that old people s life nowadays is much better than in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'meal'?
Suggestion: meal
...e for meal preparation. Making a decent meals in the morning seems not to be a good c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...a large amount of fast food over a long period of time is the primary cause of chronic bone in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82872928177 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92184763709 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560773480663 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7331982652 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244913718009 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748242428419 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536872736009 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151004424731 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527077058384 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.