In many countries, international tourism has become an important source of income. However, it also has negative effects.
Do the benefits of international tourism outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
With the drastic growth of globalization, international tourism has been playing a vital part of some countries' economies. However, many people claim that it has also led to some considerable drawbacks besides great profits, which will be detailed below.
First of all, it is obvious that international tourism can be a significant source of revenue for a country. For example, according to the latest report by the Department of Economy of Vietnam, the proportion of international tourism was recorded at roughly 45.9% of the total foreign exchange. In addition, it leads to another obvious outcome: it creates more and more jobs for local residents. Besides domestic tourists, local people can provide more and more preferential services aimed at foreign tourists, from whom they can truly profit.
Of course, on the other hand, there are also some considerable withdrawals from globalizational tourism. One of them is that the local environment is under threat. Motivated by short-term benefits, local people can exploit the local environment to its greatest extent, besides a large number of tourists who can litter, burglar local inheritages, or so on, due to their lack of common sense. Moreover, thanks to globalizational routes and travel, external diseases and sicknesses can spread among countries as far as possible. We can never forget how COVID-19, carried by tourists traveling by plane, has invaded and killed countless numbers of people all around the world.
All things considered, I don't stand against international travel since our countries can greatly take advantage of it, but we should establish a proper policy in order to protect our environment as well as our people's health. I hope we will find an absolute solution to this problem someday soon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-01 | Md Mazedul Islam | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Md Mazedul Islam | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | kiutrang | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | Blackcytrus | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | WritingMaster10.0 | 73 | view |
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred
- Sources of energy produced in USA in 1980 and 1990
- In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 90
- It s generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for music and sport and others are not However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ronment to its greatest extent, besides a large number of tourists who can litter, burglar local ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd the world. All things considered, I dont stand against international travel sinc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, of course, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29787234043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95979293645 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0643373053 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143865952259 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573254475434 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587183544745 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881031259607 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393448108394 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.