In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?
recycling is one of the most effective ways to solve environmental problems in contemporary society. people are not aware of the consequences of this. therefore, they do not take measures to improve recycling of trash.
There are many possible starting points could explain this issue. The most obvious reason is that the community is not equipped with essential education. lack of knowledge leads people to throw all of their rubbish into one place, it means that material which could have been sorted and reused is mixed in Non-recyclable wastes. Consequently, a huge mass of wastes become unusable. The other reason should be considered is the weakness of publishing laws for recycling. For example, in Iran there is no law that people who do not separate their trash would possibly get a fine.
To solve this problem, governments should take appropriate actions such as declaring strict laws and fines against citizens who won’t discriminate their wastes. Additionally, organizations who are in charged of these tasks should reward the ones who are committed to their social responsibility by cutting the taxes for them. Moreover, the government should increase the awareness of society about advantages of recycling in controlling future disasters. It can benefits the broad social advertisements and hands-on education to boost the people knowledge.
To conclude, by considering the fact that most of mentioned problems are driven from lack of social awareness, the possible solutions would be instituting foundations of social responsibilities by creating laws that support recycling and strike the ones who can’t respect them. In addition, the government can build a supportive atmosphere by social advertisement and education.
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 78
- Some people argue that it is natural talents make a sportsman famous Others believe that it is hard work Discuss both of views with your opinion 73
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effect on your children Do you agree or disagree 61
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recycling
recycling is one of the most effective ways to so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ental problems in contemporary society. people are not aware of the consequences of th...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... not aware of the consequences of this. therefore, they do not take measures to improve r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lack
... not equipped with essential education. lack of knowledge leads people to throw all ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...in controlling future disasters. It can benefits the broad social advertisements and han...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47955390335 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0805532045 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0588207482 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221175401138 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741196476857 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603308111451 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137850615536 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627136773085 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.