In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could. Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?
Nowadays, it is a recent issue that ordinary people, in a lot of nations, do not maximize waste recycling management. There are several causes and solutions from this tropical issue, which I will elucidate more below.
Regarding the causes, instead of caring of waste conversion, a majority of citizens who reside in developing countries prefer to spend more time on hard-working to fulfill daily needs. Seemingly,the higher population density causes the incremental living cost which suppress the dwellers to occupy multiple jobs rather than concerns on environmental issue. Moreover, waste-processing technique which is supported by cutting-edge technology require huge expense. Seemingly, only a few of social segment could deal with complex-waste treatment, in which this comes up with expensive fund. As a consequence, they tendentiously allocate their budget to public waste service without participating in individual household waste management.
Turning to the solutions, mitigating the environmental crisis, citizens can be encouraged to utilize friendly materials and reusable products. It is indisputable that if these new habits are implemented, the overload organic waste will significantly reduce from-time-to-time. In addition, the policymaker supposedly imposes the stricter regulation of household waste production. Take Germany as an example, the official sets waste management with plastic smart city concept, in which this policy could convert plastic garbage to shopping voucher. Therefore, the government effectively separate domestic waste production and facilitate the massive use of reusable products to the society.
In conclusion, the causes of low garbage processing among global population are time consuming and high recycling price. Meanwhile, the solutions of this are to shift biodegradable products and more discliplined environmental policy.
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development however others think social value is lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...orking to fulfill daily needs. Seemingly,the higher population density causes the in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06367041199 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3007242237 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674157303371 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9198135544 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116994072656 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376818024426 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032837345941 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763634523242 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024137048428 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...orking to fulfill daily needs. Seemingly,the higher population density causes the in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06367041199 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3007242237 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674157303371 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9198135544 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116994072656 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376818024426 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032837345941 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763634523242 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024137048428 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.