In many countries, people do not recycle waste materials, such as bottles and newspapers.
What are the reasons for this? What could be done to solve this problem?
Recycling waste products such as, glass, plastic and cartons, is not fully developed in the most country and, it is at global issue nowadays. It seems to me that there are some possible causes thus some solutions to cope with this problem.
The biggest reason for not doing recycle, is lack of awareness about its benefit to preserve our nature and reflections on one`s health. Even their day to day life route has not include neither motivation nor dedication to do such activity, whole generation of family do not intend to classify recyclable and unrecyclable final wastes at home. It is observable that example of Nigeria where indigenous people, who inherited their living routine and habit to offspring, tend to throw trashes away separately rather than refugees from abroad. Another well-known cause might be even wasting products are classified by citizens there are inadequate efficient industries to terminate this process. This makes recycling is impractical aspiration in the end. In fact that people encouraged not taking up their time on unnecessary action, which is surely not bring a better result.
Turning to possible solutions, firstly, school curriculum should provide subjects about awareness of keep recycling and sorting rubbish as possible as they can. If an early-ages have an information, they would surely habited to differentiate residual products. The London primary school attempted to do campaign which gives an elaboration ranging from recycling advantages to effects on human and environment, inasmuch the program is proceeding successfully in the early stage of life. Another presumable remedy is to build an efficient amount of facilities which empowered by the latest technology and devices. The government authorities should impose initiatives to fund for recycling and supporting those who invest own revenue to preserve nature and surrounding. Finally, older ages in the family need to be careful for their actions which impacts on vulnerable person, children. By this mean that younger ones tend to mimic if people who throw away rubbishes just into landfill not into dustbin. It is the basic step that we can focus on.
To sum up, inadequate knowledge of recycling process and fewer relative industrial companies are the main roots of not recycling nowadays, and syllabus which contained an intention to sort of products, building more capable factories and parent-influences on younger ages are could be demonstrated that adaptable way to combat these problems.
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 78
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 78
- In many countries people do not recycle waste materials such as bottles and newspapers What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'included'.
Suggestion: included
...ven their day to day life route has not include neither motivation nor dedication to do...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, in fact, sort of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40712468193 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8696289052 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631043256997 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.286970003 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205039378513 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576396045256 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435151956291 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119780887155 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423576885072 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.