In many countries, students leave school with no understanding of how to manage their money. Why is this the case? What can be done to improve students' understanding of personal finance management?
Lacking financial management skills among students following graduation is a significant problem in recent society. This passage will discuss a couple of reasons for this trend as well as solutions to handle this situation.
In regards to this problem, there are a number of possible solutions. Educational systems that value a theoretically heavy curriculum over practical knowledge seem to be one of the highlighted reasons. For most Asians, great performance in main subjects like maths or languages is much more significant than soft skill understanding. Therefore, practical skills like money management and saving are undervalued. On the other hand, ignorance of a child’s money management ability is one of the considerations. Since on most Asian continents, children are taught when they are a child that their parents are always willing to help them solve any problem related to money, so they just need to focus on their schooling , even when they are grown-ups .
To tackle this situation, several methods are given to help students become familiar with the pivotal aspects of financial management. Firstly, instead of focusing solely on theories or hypotheses, schools can provide their students with extracurricular activities after class. This will encourage their students to study more about ways to use their money effectively. ABC Bilingual school in Bien Hoa city, for instance, gives students the chance to take part in summer courses which are not only relaxing but also informative as it instructs students on ways to save their money. Besides, parents can give their children allowances weekly to teach their sons how to manage their own finances.
In conclusion, if personal finance controlling skill is soon noticed at school, students can be set stable bases for developing themselves as well as their career paths in the future.
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
... solutions to handle this situation. In regards to this problem, there are a number of pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey just need to focus on their schooling , even when they are grown-ups . To ta...
^^
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...schooling , even when they are grown-ups . To tackle this situation, several me...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38698630137 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90485948314 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647260273973 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5826348877 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312484242387 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102556394102 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553451219717 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179575352135 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069228433998 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.