Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy However in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Do you think this a positive or negative development

Renewable energy is increasingly used stead of fossil fuel in many countries. I completely agree that this kind of scheme would be a good idea.
There are several reasons why fossil fuel such as coal or oil should be less used. Firstly, burning this kind of energy would increase CO2 emissions leading to detrimental impacts on our environment. Coal, for example, is considered the dirtiest source of electricity in the world. Secondly, they do more than pump CO2, in many recent finds, they release a mix of gases and tiny particles causing illness, maybe leading to death. Finally, not many countries have fossil fuel riches, so they must import from others.
I believe that alternative energy that uses the natural power of the wind, waves and sun would be better. Using this clean and green power will reduce drastically the amount of CO2, which contribute to air pollution. Furthermore, alternative sources of energy are roughly unlimited since they are renewable in the appropriate conditions. Therefore, they can raise the prospect of nations becoming self-sufficient in produce energy without relying on other countries.
In conclusion, my view is that the use of friendly-environment energy like natural power is a positive development that should be fostered worldwide.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ases and tiny particles causing illness, maybe leading to death. Finally, not man...
^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment that should be fostered worldwide.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 205.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26829268293 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97323375751 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658536585366 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7254560298 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339486554853 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112908551411 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625013941903 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18904946777 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236544684447 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.