Many criminal commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this ? What effects will they have on society?
Reoffending after serving jail time has become a predictable tendency for many offenders as crime commitment rates still increase despite harsh punishment. While there is a plethora of reasons for this development, I believe this is due to the lack of support from the government and the unacceptance of society upon their return that lead to this consequence. Therefore, necessary interventions from the government are advised to prevent return participation in crimes.
First and foremost, a dominant reason for convicted lack of cooperation is the absence of suitable occupations for their rehabilitation. Since the abilities that brought them to prison cannot provide many benefits in the workplace, along with the black mark a criminal background has on a person, all of the combined factors can have a negative effect on their career. This led to unemployment and financial instability for many past fugitives, enticing them to return to wrongdoings. Additionally, inadequateness in positive influence can affect their actions detrimentally. The lack of condonation and support from acquaintances, under intense suspicion and disapproval from the community, while simultaneously being pressured by old outlaws, will usually break an individual's mental fortitude, tempting them to illicit activities once again.
Because of those reasons, it is of utmost importance to assist ex-convicts to prevent them from indulging in the old paths. For instance, aids from the authorities during their jail time will prove to be beneficial to the criminals. Rehabilitation and financial assistance programmes can help inmates to develop the necessary skills for the quality of possible jobs when they finish serving their sentences and reduce their economic burdens. Moreover, policies to encourage the halt of biased scepticism and the separation of people with past records of criminal activities can improve the social experiences of former wrongdoers to further disapprove of the option of reoffending for past culprits.
In conclusion, there are a myriad of justifications for lawbreakers to recommit crimes. Nonetheless, with proper approaches from the administrations and an approving outlook, reoffends rates should decrease.
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 89
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at stores Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 93
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... a criminal background has on a person, all of the combined factors can have a negative ef...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 764, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...ured by old outlaws, will usually break an individuals mental fortitude, tempting them to illi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...t culprits. In conclusion, there are a myriad of justifications for lawbreakers to re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72289156627 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27544695657 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599397590361 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.651059516 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14890070528 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449511129095 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340655538408 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825248570575 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387198680636 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.