Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is it the case? Is it a positive development?
In recent years, there has been a phenomenon wherein several developing countries' increasing reliance on and being encouraged to tourism to boost their local economies. From my point of view, I argue that such a trend has succeeded and has brought significant benefits to the natives and the community. However, I consider that some potential adverse impacts should not be overlooked at the same time.
There are a plethora of reasons for governments to develop the tourism sector. To begin with, the travel industry has been a huge source of income for nations that are copiously rich in unique natural scenery. Hence, proliferate these developing countries' gross domestic product. To illustrate, according to the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism, Vietnam, which has numerous original landscapes, genuine historical heritage, and an abundance of wildlife in natural areas such as Ha Long Bay, Phong Nha-Ke Bang national park, and so on, earns approximately $125 million each year in tourism, attracting millions of both overseas and local tourists. This caused a significant change in Vietnam's economy, and this country has become one of the 20 nations in the world that obtains the most money from the tourism industry. Furthermore, the tourism sector may create job opportunities for local people. Instead of being at home or having a limited choice in a number of occupations, locals can find a job as a tour guide, driver, hotel, or salesperson. These can ameliorate natives' income and improve their quality of life. Moving further, the public's general living standards are also improved due to investment in the construction of tourism facilities. Transport systems, including major transit terminals, and road conditions are a typical example to demonstrate how natives' daily traveling can be facilitated.
Despite certain advantages mentioned above, I believe that this trend could damage both nature and societies. On an environmental level, the construction of modern facilities like hotels and highways may destroy natural habitats or indigenous flora and fauna. As a result, this leads to global warming and causes many tragedies like climate change and hurricanes. On a social level, although tourism is generating enormous financial wealth and has become the primary source of income for different nations, this phenomenon may make conflicts among natives and tourists, especially with international visitors. This might be explained by the fact that they bring their patterns of behavior associated with insufficient knowledge of the host country. For instance, the inappropriate and selfish attitude of a group of Chinese tourists during a dinner in Da Nang City a few years ago, coupled with the loud noise they make, which is, in fact, a real nuisance to people around. Even though this example does not represent the actions of the rest of the Chinese people, a minority of visitors did increase tension between the two countries more involved. Additionally, in the intricate context of the COVID-19 pandemic, all tourism activities, notably in the global category, are closed by the government to prevent citizens from getting infected by the Corona viruses, which have killed millions of inhabitants. Consequently, many countries have lost huge amounts of revenue from the tourism industry. People may lose their jobs and massive income, which were coming out ahead previously. Numerous territories that, before the pandemic, were popular with visitors, like Phuket or the Maldives, now look like abandoned islands with no citizens.
In summary, the phenomenon of developing countries expanding their tourist industries is beneficial for local as well as the growth in total national income. Nevertheless, several drawbacks to extending tourism cannot be denied. The government should not focus excessive resources only on the tourism sector; they should invest in a balanced method in all industries, avoid the worst-case scenarios that could ruin a prosperous economy in the near future
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Pentland from 1950 to 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 74
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 67
- Children are experiencing increasing educational social and commercial pressures What are the causes What measures do you think can be taken to reduce them 78
- With many problems of transport and accommodation in cities some governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 41.998997996 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3403.0 1615.20841683 211% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 624.0 315.596192385 198% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45352564103 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99799879888 4.20363070211 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89321323724 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 368.0 176.041082164 209% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1065.6 506.74238477 210% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7215610216 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.037037037 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2962962963 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148851759676 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428286267971 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709491593266 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106096662981 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506255784321 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 214.0 78.4519038076 273% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.