Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same. Some people consider this to be a positive development, while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Countries have tendency to have shops and offerings which are similar to each other. This trend have both negative and positive affects which will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, there are many benefits associated with nations providing customers with same products and stores. The first positive impact is that it increases competition among countries. This encourage business lower their cost while raising redeeming features of their goods and services. The trend would benefit the final consumers as well as encourage the flourishment of companies with more competitive advantages. In addition, nations and local areas can make use of the fierce competition by motivating the development in other products and services and lead to the diversity of merchandises and shop concepts. Some regions and land are rendered with special climate and soil are capable of growing their indigenous plant or animals, which are highly demanding on the market. Take Vietnamese durian as an example, the economical fruit is now planted widely in the middle of Viet Nam’s areas, which once were used for growing low-valued rice paddy fields. Thus, The increasing in the similarities of products and services globally would not only merits the buyers but also optimizes the capital use within nations which fosters the posperity of economy and well-being of individuals.
On the other hand, the development would cause the sameness between offerings, elimination weak businesses and jeorpadising the economic development of impoverished nations. First, the phenomenon would result in the monotonous pattern of manufacturing of countries. Some governments are afraid of adjusting their manufacturing pattern and hesitate to adapt to constant changes in the taste of customers, which lead to gradual loss of market share to other nations. An additional drawback is that firms producing products or providing services with lower quality and higher expenditure, which fail to compete with overseas counterparts, are placed at risks of going bankruptcy. Disappearance of local businesses in turn poses a threat to the employment rate of countries and threatens economies as a whole. Due to the afore-mentioned facts, countries which are unable to supply people with their own commodities and different services are prone to the impacts of civil unrest as well as world events.
In sum, even though there are challenges related to the movement, I believe that if countries keep giving same offering to customers, their economy can be damaged by the external forces of competition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-08 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 89
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Everyone should stay at school until 18 To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...h are similar to each other. This trend have both negative and positive affects whic...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1056, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'would' requires base form of the verb: 'merit'
Suggestion: merit
...ts and services globally would not only merits the buyers but also optimizes the capit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44611528822 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91820602554 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576441102757 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1884338542 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.823529412 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220334789954 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667035212168 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604937450216 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143560887518 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607513269635 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.