Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

While so many establishments put economic growth as their main objective, others believe that other aspects of development deserve the same attention as well. There are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy which are going to be elaborated and in the end, I will assert my own opinion.

On the one hand, There is a belief among some authorities which economy should be considered a priority in comparison with other matters related to people's quality of life. That is, if the government does not invest enough in economic matters of society, it will impinge on other areas as well. Take annual revenue gained through oil industry as example. Having oil price decreased noticeably, it can have deleterious effects on sanitation systems such as hospitals. Moreover, the more a country is developed economically, the more self-confidence it acquires in the international conventions.

On the other hand, There are others claiming that making a progress is a necessary target for all aspects which are connected to people's lives. The most compelling reason for their claim is that these aspects are so inextricably intertwined with each other that failing to reach the standards in each one can have a ripple effect on others, leading to economic collapse. The good illustration of this is the situation of politically isolated countries being imposed by international crippling sanctions. Political problems due to lack of diplomacy can have dire consequences in different matters such as banking and import and export operations. In addition, being deprived of carrying out projects with international companies can raise the costs to staggering sums. The extra investment could be spent on improving other fields such as national infrastructures.

To sum up, There are rational arguments on both sides of this contentious topic, however it is my firm conviction that the regime's attention should be apportioned equally to the improvement of all aspects as they are inseparable and completely linked to each other, therefore not addressing one's shortcomings can harm the other fields as well.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-08 nguyenthaian0127 78 view
2023-10-06 LILY_JANE 84 view
2023-09-08 hau le 56 view
2023-09-06 hau le 56 view
2023-08-14 thaohienpt008 73 view
Essays by user amirrezakhdb :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...omparison with other matters related to peoples quality of life. That is, if the govern...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
..., There are others claiming that making a progress is a necessary target for all aspects w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... for all aspects which are connected to peoples lives. The most compelling reason for t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regimes'' or 'regime's'?
Suggestion: regimes'; regime's
...wever it is my firm conviction that the regimes attention should be apportioned equally...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to each other, therefore not addressing ones shortcomings can harm the other fields ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32035928144 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05928401564 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577844311377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0631169225 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184015573288 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547491684432 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435065375532 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105466641084 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288710550584 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.