Recently, the phenomenon of economic progress and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running controversy or discourse between governments and people. In this regard, whereas some of the leaders believe that economic development is the main priority, others are the opinion that not only economic backwardness but also social injustice and political oppression cannot be overlooked. In my mind, economic improvement plays a significant role, due to its fundamental role.
On the one hand, focusing on the economic development while improving military power in the region that the country is housed, is the characteristic of the leaders that underestimate their peoples’ right to experience a normal life. Hence, citizens are deprived of national wealth’s benefits, by investing in other budget segmentations. To give an instance, full of natural resources and well-educated people, Iran was one of the major economic power in the middle-east. However, investing in empowering Arab regions’ military as well as accessing nuclear power has rendered major economic backwardness in two recent decades. Therefore, many Iranians claim their rights, including but not limited to social rights, freedom, so on and so forth besides a better financial situation with less inflation.
On the other hand, many governors or economists are firmly convinced that without a progressive economy their political position cannot remain stable against their counterparts. In a similar vein, research concludes that the wealth grade of a person signals his or her power and social status. Furthermore, without a progressive economic government cannot allocate the required financial resources in other budget sectors, namely, healthcare, Medicare, Medicaid, insurance, public transport, education, academic research, etc.
To sum up, despite the compelling reasons of both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea of focusing on economic development would have more benefits in a long-term plan, however, its drawbacks cannot be overlooked especially in less-developed countries that human rights cannot be neglected easily by the rulers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running controversy or discourse between govern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nts and people. In this regard, whereas some of the leaders believe that economic developme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port, education, academic research, etc. To sum up, despite the compelling reason...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnot be neglected easily by the rulers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81904761905 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13859579632 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8185361439 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.75 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17331446512 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591131816775 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394146489246 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980911721926 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366961779972 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.