Bullying among children especially schoolboys becomes ubiquitous conduct, which is one of the main concerns of the education system in societies. The following discourse delves into some of the compelling reasons that led to this issue, as well as the relevant solutions.
Firstly, at the mercy of technological advancement, especially in the field of devices, offspring have continuous access to a myriad of game web services, platforms, applications, and the like that allow them to access a variety of virtual games almost without any constraints. In addition, parents take full advantage of this opportunity by working long hours in order to cover the prohibitive cost of modern life. Thereby staying long hours outside the home and having limited control over the content of games create an inappropriate environment for children to play digital games. Sad is, research has recently concluded that around 90% of children, ranges from 11-18, have the highest tendency to play bullying context games.
Secondly, to investigate the issue deeper, research addresses the nature of humankind as there is a tendency in all humans to signal their social status and power in various ways, including but not limited to physical strength, wealth, and appearance. However, the way that male does is not similar to female, as men mostly indicate their status through physical strength, while female signaling with conspicuous consumption. Consistent with the aforementioned academic finding and imagining school as a society on a smaller scale has the same behavioral pattern as toddlers experience how to show their power and domain to each other by bullying. However, they have limited access to the resources compared with those of adults have. To make an instance, in co-educational schools bullying may occur to deter another boy-classmate from poaching a girl classmate that he cooperates with her in all class actives. In contrast, in the real world, an adult solves the issue with financial tools such as by covering the cost of the attire of her partner.
Finally, it cannot be neglected, bullying is more common among the lower echelon of societies as their physical power is their main tool to defend their right. Therefore, the dominant behavior in society permeates easily in their schools as children emulate their parents' conduct.
In short, to tackle the issue, toddlers need to learn how to interact in a peaceful atmosphere through virtual strategic games as well as physical strategic games in schools. In addition, parents need to expend more time, energy, and financial resources to split up their children from digital devices and spend as much as needed within nature, which will be attenuate the bullying behavior of kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...es. The following discourse delves into some of the compelling reasons that led to this iss...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, as well as the relevant solutions. At the mercy of technological advancemen...
^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endency to play bullying context games. Secondly, to investigate the issue deepe...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'stratum the lowest'.
Suggestion: stratum the lowest
...ng is more common among the proletarian stratum lowest tier of societies as their physical pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in addition, in contrast, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 41.998997996 193% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31447963801 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78691250468 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574660633484 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9868139169 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.176470588 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0475050708262 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154297468389 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.015463381615 0.0667982634062 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0214014996096 0.151304729494 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162174525514 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.