Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many authorities believe that economic growth is their highest priority. However, others, me included, believe that other progress such as human and environmental should be prioritized equally as well.
Economic improvement leads to higher living standards of its country. By focusing on developing the economy, the governments are to create job opportunities for citizens so that they can earn their living, pay their bills, and have their own savings. Consequently, other sectors can be improved such as the reduction in poverty, healthcare, and incentives for public and private investors. Thus, it can boost the economy even more.
On the other hand, solely focusing on financial growth without considering other factors may lead to adverse ramifications. Firstly, if society is geared toward economic growth, people have to work for longer hours. Subsequently, they might miss out on their leisure time that is a crucial element to boost productivity. Secondly, environmental progress should not be overlooked. Following the rise in the economy, the higher output can lead to increased pollution such as air pollution from factories' smoke, marine pollution from oil spills, and water pollution from chemical disposal. Hence, these pollutions may make a significant reduction in living standards. For instance, according to an economic article, China's break-neck period of economic growth has led to a dramatic increase in CO2 emission from 2 tonnes in 2002 to 8 tonnes in 2014 that is 4 times higher.
In conclusion, the rise in the economy may have many obvious benefits. Yet our world is not just an economic cycle, therefore, factors like humans, the environment should be treated equally as they are important elements to support economic growth.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...and environmental should be prioritized equally as well. Economic improvement leads to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...mans, the environment should be treated equally as they are important elements to support ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44890510949 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92087795903 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8379493252 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17102889916 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548946052975 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390157229323 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109735564116 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203655248063 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.