Countries development are directly associated with the policies of their governments. While some may argue that the focus should be on the financial sector, others, in which I include myself, consider that other areas as health or environment are equally as important.
First of all, it's impossible to deny the importance that the financial sector have in the development of a nation. If that growth is successful, it can reflect, later on, in others fields as education or health. With increase of income and economic stability, the state can invest more money in building new schools and universities to improve its population education. Moreover, the construction of better renewed hospitals can only be made with investment. Although money is essential, there are other areas that governments should invest their time.
There are several factors that contribute for the growth of a country. The health care system is is one of the main areas of focus in a developed society, as well as, the environmental policies that must be changed in order to prevent climate change. First of all, since most of the cities in the world have an increasing older population, the heath department must be a priority to provide answers, to the higher incidence of pathologies in this age group. Furthermore, with pollution increasing and it's impact on climate, nowadays is crucial to change some key points, to a greener future, as for example, reducing taxes in electric cars. These are just some reasons, that other factors have to be present when one is considering the progress of a country.
To conclude, there is no denying of the major importance of economic stability but when it is analysed the progress of a specific country, there must be other fields taken into account, as the heath care system and environmental policies. I also should add that if all these areas are balanced properly, the formula for success maybe more easily reached.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 89
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or working a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 35
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ther areas as health or environment are equally as important. First of all, its imposs...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...th of a country. The health care system is is one of the main areas of focus in a dev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as for, for example, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06853582555 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80391830506 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5673928979 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.214285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162595724757 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556282536272 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474117332363 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986378920755 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297143270321 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.