Work decisions during an individual lifetime are unique and each of us has it's own path. Some may argue that it is advisable to remain in the same company for all life, others say, in which I include myself, that different experiences are the way to go, if learning and personal growth are the main goals.
First of all, there are positive points in remaining in the same organisation until retirement. These include, the fact that it is easier to move up into a higher position and at the same time give more personal and family stability. On one hand, when a worker adapts to a particular task he usually get better at it and with time, with the knowledge acquired, take a position where he would be leading a team. On the other hand, an advantage to remain in one place permanently, can allow a person to buy a house, have children and build a family close to the work facilities. Although all of this is true, there are other points of view that should be considered.
Working for several employers and in different cities or countries can also be a good foundation for a more solid future. Several experiences can be beneficial for acquiring more knowledge in the working field but also for personal development in other areas as well. For example, if a doctor during is life, travel to many countries, it has more probability to come in contact with rarer diseases, that are endemic to some specific countries. Moreover, can learn new languages during that process, as well as interacting with a variety of cultures, that surely will have an impact on his personality. These are just some reasons that could make anyone think twice in remaining in the same place for their whole life.
In conclusion, although there are surely some strong points in remaining permanently in the same organisation, there are even more important, if it is considered the experiences learned on several jobs. It is also possible to recommend that if a change is planned, it should occur in a younger age where adaptation e usually easier.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 33
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 84
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...d each of us has its own path. Some may argue that it is advisable to remain in the s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
... adapts to a particular task he usually get better at it and with time, with the kn...
^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...ust some reasons that could make anyone think twice in remaining in the same place fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74576271186 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69054116828 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2514135973 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302867826977 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991164234808 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703921302707 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166137335397 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090077300564 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.