Although, it can become harmful for our health, high amount of suger is now added to the food and beverage products to meke it more enjoyable. Terefore, the cost of these products will be inceased in order to discourage consumer. I entirely spport this notion.. My inclination is justified in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments to put forward my view point, the principle one is that these high sugar leveled products are not fundametal things.
if the price of basic necessity such as milk, vegetables, fruits, eggs, meat and grains would be increased than all the members of society are affected. But, this rise neither affect basic emenities nor essential needs; thus, it would be a wise solution for the authority. Moreover, those who do not afford this unhealthy products will spend their money effectively on other products. One recent survey carried out by The Time Of India have concluded that by inceresing price of alcoholic liquids, 26% Indian population has given-up their habit of alcohol consumption and become a less addictive. This a clear illustration of postive outcomes of the incresing price on perticular items.
However, according to few peoples, increment in cost could not a solution for less consumption. In a modern society on group of member also exist whose do not have any effect of the price of products. Either they are from welthier family or have other way to collect money. Thus, that types of people not affected. Moreover, crime rate will also incresed by imposing high cost. By this i mean that few people have a addiction of this products and if they lack money to but them than will choose illegal way for earning.
To conclude, the rise in high suger level products some part of society will become unehtical; nonetheless, there are not any other way to cope-up with such situation as more people became unconsious about their health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...ased in order to discourage consumer. I entirely spport this notion.. My inclination is justifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... consumer. I entirely spport this notion.. My inclination is justified in the ensu...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...d products are not fundametal things. if the price of basic necessity such as mi...
^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...erticular items. However, according to few peoples, increment in cost could no...
^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...incresed by imposing high cost. By this i mean that few people have a addiction o...
^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...st. By this i mean that few people have a addiction of this products and if they ...
^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ean that few people have a addiction of this products and if they lack money to but ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e became unconsious about their health.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94984326019 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59583843447 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579937304075 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1180454108 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8823529412 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162896543781 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047136943754 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470903409174 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104787078845 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037450160682 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.