Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a well-known fact that processed foods are rich in sugar and their consumption can lead to a lot of diseases. Some people believe that hiking the price of these consumables will prompt the masses to consume less sugar. However, I disagree and believe that people will splurge on sugary stuff in spite of the price hike.
For example, scientists have demonstrated that consumption of foodstuffs rich in sugars increases the levels of dopamine in the brain. This hormone not only elevates the mood of a person but also increases their craving for sugars. Therefore, a mere hike in the price of sugar-rich consumables will not deter customers from consuming more sugar.
I also believe that the masses are unaware of the fact that processed foods are rich in sugars. Furthermore, they are ignorant of the outcomes of consuming such unhealthy foods. A recent food survey conducted among teens by the AIIMS institute, Delhi, revealed that most participants who consume junk food are at a higher risk of developing diabetes compared to the ones who occasionally eat junk.
Thus, people will continue to buy foods irrespective of their cost, if not sensitized regarding their side effects. The government should make it mandatory for junk food companies to disclose information regarding the number of calories in each food packet. The government should also run public service ads to bring home the fact that junk food consumption is bad for health.
To summarise, I disagree with the idea that increasing the price of sugary foods will prevent people from buying them. A better solution is to make them aware of the consequences of eating too much junk food.
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 56
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02166064982 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70036101083 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3693606703 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187800804942 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692383011617 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458469396445 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106870148847 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372721855291 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.