Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many
health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to
consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently hazardous health issues have been caused by the perilous amounts of sugary product
prices ought to be extravagant to control consumption. To be frank, I agree with the given
opinion for several reasons.
On the one hand, high prices are able to prevent consumers from overusing sugar food. As a
matter of fact, manufactured food and drink are only in people’s favor because of their low cost
and convenience. It is clear that in case of the cost rockets. convenience will no longer be found
and the market could be conquered by other kinds of products. For example, a ton of tomato
sauce is much more frugal than tomatoes itself, and consumers are attracted by this, ignoring the
high amount of sweetened compared to natural tomatoes. However, once the price went up, higher than the traditional products, buyers' options would be more economical. On the other
hand, exorbitant costs are also a challenge to manufacturers. food establishments are not able to
deal with taxes unless consumers buy their products. this led to another path for those factories
to change the products they sell. For instance, a company that made money by selling sugary
products could not face financial issues when running out of consumers. this means their
products are no longer suitable for the food marketed when nobody wanted to buy sugary
products due to the expensive cost. Then the establishments decided to change to selling
vegetables, which is more financially rewarding.
In conclusion, by pushing the price to the highest peak, sugary product consumption can be
controlled. In my view, if the prices increase and sugar is used less, people will be protected from
such fatal diseases as diabetes and obesity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Convenience
...clear that in case of the cost rockets. convenience will no longer be found and the market...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Food
... are also a challenge to manufacturers. food establishments are not able to deal wi...
^^^^
Line 11, column 54, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...es unless consumers buy their products. this led to another path for those factories...
^^^^
Line 13, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...l issues when running out of consumers. this means their products are no longer sui...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16607773852 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74767646019 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.889929828 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273000489555 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772510419463 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460062380682 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734287749821 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469410985988 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.