:Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?

Essay topics:

:Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?

It is true that tourists from many countries of the world pay more attention to museums and historical places than local inhabitants. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be addressed by the governments to attract more local people.
There are two main reasons why museums and historical sites are preferred more by foreigners than local residents. One reason is that museums are too familiar with local people. If museums do not change, there will be nothing new for the locals to explore. Like eating the same dish every single day, they feel bored with visiting the same places. Furthermore, entrance tickets at some historical sites are quite expensive for the local inhabitants to afford. For instance, some famous historical attractions in the north of Vietnam sell the tickets at prohibitively expensive that the local residents who live on budget can not be able to afford.
Since such issues are serious, the government should take place to tackle this problem effectively. Firstly, museums should be invested in more by the authorities to refresh the exhibits. For example, they should adopt new technology like virtual reality to clearly present historical stories. Secondly, historical relics need to be free for local people. This is an effective way to attract local inhabitants who worry about extra expenditures to visit historical sites and broaden their horizons about their home towns
In conclusion, there is a range of reasons for this trend. However, many solutions should be applied by the authorities to attract more visitors form the local areas.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-31 kalppatel 61 view
2019-12-31 kalppatel 73 view
2019-12-31 kalppatel 73 view
2019-12-13 LucyLiu 84 view
2019-11-06 Tania uppal 73 view
Essays by user quangphan4697 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23846153846 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68527653309 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0026089208 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441229456942 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152715612954 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719972153689 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273781767649 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585432883903 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.