Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Although museums and historical attractions are always open to everybody, not many local residents pay interest to these places. There are several causes of this trend, and some solutions should be proposed to encourage more local people to visit these destinations.
To begin with, there are some reasons why few local people decide to go to cultural and historical points. Firstly, the exhibition of museums and historical sites are not sufficient attractive to draw the attention of local people to visit them. For example, visitors coming to those places in general can only see old artifacts and antiques, which easily makes them feel bored. Also children have to read or listen to too much educational content rather than to enjoy any other interesting experience that they cannot have at school. Nevertheless, those places are still visited by other visitors since those travelers can broaden their horizons by witnessing historical proofs or other exhibits which they may not find in their local sites.
Several actions can be taken to increase the number of local tourists. The first solution would be to make museums and historical places more appealing. This can be done by adding more entertainment values through the exhibition like games or interactive activities. As a result, children are more likely to go and spend time in these places. In addition, models in these places should be visually spectacular with sound, light and narrators’ voice, which can allow the viewers to follow each events in the battles clearly. The final solution is to employ professional guides to talk to visitors about detailed commentary of the exhibition. In this way, museums and historical places can serve to teach people about cultural, history, science and many other aspects of life.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why museums and historical site are less attractive to local people, and some measures could be introduced so that those stopping points can appeal to a broader audience.
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- There are more workers who work from home and more students who study from home. This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 89
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Today TV channels provide men s sport shows more than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Organize tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. It is a positive or negative development for the local and the environment? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...es, which easily makes them feel bored. Also children have to read or listen to too ...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts can appeal to a broader audience.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69636228732 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4752402712 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471297098185 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150618351018 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935809718987 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287281848773 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535273332404 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.