Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Exceptionally, there are some museums ticketing visitors while some do not. I contend that the disadvantages of this are eclipsed by its advantages as the tourists’ experience would be better and conservation awareness will be enhanced among people.
For one thing, the option to set an entrance cost for museums would hamper low-class residents from ample exotic knowledge and broaden their horizon in many aspects. One possibility is that some individuals could not afford the fee as their financial capacity is limited. Recreational activities are deemed lavish to them and paying for a museum ticket is the same thing. This is negatively influential in terms of their understanding about the cultures are considerably limited but also their sense of appreciation of history is comparatively lower than the general residents. Ostensibly, instead of educational purposes, museums function based on commercial benefits, which is especially miserable for those living in poor conditions and even unable to receive formal education.
For another, I believe that the prescribed downside is just a minor exception, compared to the general public, a museum ticket is generally affordable. These institutions should have a reasonable entrance fee in order to maintain their operation, and for the most part, instill in the public the duty of preserving historical and cultural value in these places. Precisely, when tourists visit the museums, they will contribute financially to the state budget or the owners to upgrade the facilities and offer greater experience for the visitors. Importantly, paying for the ticket would entail an appreciative sensation among people. Those who come from poor backgrounds or with low socioeconomic status are occasionally exposed to such things, which would make them treasure the moments and uphold their responsibilities in preserving invaluable objects as well as other forms of artifacts with priceless meanings.
To conclude, there are minor drawbacks of ticketing museum visitors. However, I contend that it is overshadowed by its benefits within a firm.
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people think it is one of the best ways to solve environmental problems by increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...city is limited. Recreational activities are deemed lavish to them and paying for...
^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is is negatively influential in terms of their understanding about the cultures a...
^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...just a minor exception, compared to the general public, a museum ticket is generally affordabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09815973604 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7725079561 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192342122093 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656381527142 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511938887896 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10892359832 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034321847612 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.