In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
In this modern society today, humans are tending to choose to live single or in a small family rather than in a nuclear family in the past. In my perspective, I believe that this tendency has both advantages and disadvantages. This essay below will outline them.
On the one hand, there are some benefits for people to get when they live alone or in a small family. Firstly, many young people will have good conditions to develop themselves. For example, many students now have to stay away from their families for pursuing their studies, they will become more independent and confident as they will have to learn how to take care of themselves and make their own decisions without evaluating on guidance from their families. Freedom is also a reason for people to choose this form of life. You would be able to eat anywhere or do whatever they want to do without caring or worrying about other people's opinions. Children of small families, especially first and only children, tend to have higher school and personal achievement levels than do children of larger families. All care, attention and finance will be focused on him/her so he/she will have more chances to study abroad and gain international qualifications and that would ensure them a better job after graduation.
On the other hand, this trend also brings several drawbacks. First of all, the old often suffer from diseases such as heart attack so when the illness develops without someone beside them that is really dangerous. Besides, elderly people often have more free time, which will make them experience feelings of loneliness and isolation when they live alone and that will cause mental problems, for instance, depression. Furthermore, in this society today, both parents go to work, children in small families often have lack care and guidance. The kids could easily engage in criminal activities such as illegal drug use or illegal gambling that may ruin their future.
In conclusion, the shrink of household size is accompanied by both merits and demerits. Personally, I remain uncertain whether this trend is positive or not.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01986754967 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61160684816 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5354899237 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134166437631 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496624581734 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574343236615 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969283662189 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575287741704 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.