Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
Whether the history should preserve or not is a matter of debate. Some people are in the support of destroying the archaic establishments and building modern infrastructures. This essay will argue why the historical buildings should be preserved and provide evidence.
To begin with, the history should be maintained for a number of reasons. Firstly, these structures provide an insight about a nation, showing how our ancestors used to live and thrived to become a successful nation. Without these evidence, we could know only by reading books, which might not be effective in providing the appropriate lesson. Furthermore, most of the ancient buildings have rich architecture, which assist us to develop modern building technology. These old structures are eye-catching also. For example, the beautiful Mughal establishments Lal bagh fort, which situated in the capital of Bangladesh, has been declared as world heritage site by UNESCO. A numerous number of tourists visit to Bangladesh to see this great architecture. As a result, my country earns a lot large amount of revenue from it's tourist sector. For these reasons, these archaic establishments should be preserved.
However, the modernization should not be discourages because it is needed for the development of country. I believe that old buildings can be protected in a structured and thoughtful way. To be more specific, the historic buildings can be renovated by keeping their original architecture, and these buildings can be used in modern way. These old buildings of the country are not hindered for development, rather these can be utilized in a way so that the country can be benefited from them. By studying and analyzing the past, we can take lesson, which helps us to build a better world for the future generations.
To sum up, the ancient historical buildings should not be demolished, rather these should be preserved. A country can earn valuable revenue by attracting tourist from inside and outside parts of the world, and they also provide valuable insights about our past. Therefore, these old structures should not be regarded as obstacles for development, rather they should be used in a productive way.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 85
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 67
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 67
- The government in Littleville plans to build a large mall in a newly constructed zone just outside the city. Littleville hopes to attract many wealthy clients who it believes will shop at the Littleville Mall's many planned boutique stores. Ten years 67
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
.... These old structures are eye-catching also. For example, the beautiful Mughal esta...
^^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...development, rather they should be used in a productive way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey should be used in a productive way.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02717083517 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5086182944 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.05 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294191469233 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103329204956 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751509662869 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206228937235 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362222197969 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.