In many parts of the world, people rely on private cars for transportation.
In what ways does reliance on private cars affect the way we live?
Do the effects tend to be positive or negative?
Nowadays, individuals depend on their private cars to transport in lieu of using public transportation or other vehicles. There are various effects surrounding this issue, especially environmental problems. In my opinion, those effects have a propensity to be more negative.
On the one hand, there are numerous effects which affect directly to people’s life. To be more precise, individuals tend to have a sedentary life and rely on private cars, instead, they try to figure out other solutions to tackle their problems. Because private transportation brings them more convenient than public one so using personal cars is better to feel more private than the others. Besides that, it is more likely to commute for anyone since their time is not wasted. This means that they can have more spare time to spend on another activity instead of being worried about their vehicles. By using personal cars, more roomy spaces are created surrounding people’s lives. Taking America as an example, according to Harvard University’s survey, more than 75% people in their country find it easy to use their personal car instead of public transportation. Those who use this kind of transportation do not feel time-consuming every morning when they have to be on time at their workplace.
On the other hand, the effects which using private cars causes are not less than people think. Private transportation releases more exhausted fumes than public transportation such as buses or subway. This leads to a big impact on human’s environment because it can increase the quantity of CO2 air in the atmosphere. Therefore, individuals have to face a series of environmental challenges which fumes from private cars cause. People are destroying nature and the living environment day by day. Moreover, the number of traffic congestion is growing because most roads are covered by many and many cars. This also leads to the ruin of infrastructure promptly, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries because of the bad one.
In conclusion, there are a plethora of adverse causes of this pitfall which must be considered instead of only concentrating on any benefits which using private cars brings to us. I personally ponder that the negative effects in this problem outweigh the positive one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oping countries because of the bad one. In conclusion, there are a plethora of a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26702997275 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95782057716 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520435967302 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3618045076 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.65 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.35 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243567155559 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781298632224 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518306366522 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16261019877 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136545402676 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.