The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how the amount of millions of oil barrels fluctuated over a period of 20 years in six Gulf countries, namely Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and UAE.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that the quantity of oil in Saudi Arabia was at least more than thrice as high as the others. It is also clear to see that there were upward patterns in the number of five countries, with the exception of Qatar.
Looking at the graph, in the first year of the period, the number of oil production in Saudi Arabia was the highest, with about 9 million barrels. In the meantime, the figure for Qatar was just under 1 million per day. Over the following 20 years, the number of oil barrels in Saudi Arabia reached over 14 million per day while the quantity of one in Qatar was still under 1 million.
About the others, around 2 million barrels per day were the number of oil production in the other countries in 1990. By 2010, the quantity of oil production in five countries had experienced a gradual upward trend, at around 4 million per day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...tterns in the number of five countries, with the exception of Qatar. Looking at the graph, in the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so, still, while, at least, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47208121827 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31341801435 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8266790602 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169603557877 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861303920611 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619094816338 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105911539701 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642807546471 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.