Many people believe that charity organizations should give aid to those in greatest need, wherever they live. Others believe that charity organizations should concentrate on people who live in their own countries. Discuss and give your own opinion
Despite the advanced lives of people throughout the world, poverty and other social issues still exist. While some people argue that charitable institutions should provide support to those in greatest need, others believe they should focus on indigenous people. I partly agree with the latter perspective for the following reasons.
On the one hand, several serious issues have taken place on a global scale and cannot be tackled by focusing on a particular area. For instance, COVID-19 first existed in a province in China but soon became a nightmare, leaving a huge negative influence on people’s lives throughout the world. If charity organizations had only supported people living in their own country, there would have been more deaths, and the pandemic would have become even more serious. Another point worth considering is that the bond between countries can be strengthened. When a charitable institution from a developed country assists a developing or underdeveloped one, they are likely to appreciate the help and always want to repay the organization. Multinational giants can take advantage of this opportunity to break into its domestic market.
On the other hand, the local people should be prioritized over those in greater need from another country. Chief among these is that the charity’s prosperity comes from the contributions of individuals living in its country. Therefore, it is reasonable to prioritize the needs of these people. If they help people at the international level while ignoring various domestic issues, the locals’ sustainable incomes may suffer, and the charity’s financial provision cannot be guaranteed.
In conclusion, in my opinion, charitable organizations cannot only focus on their own native people, and more efforts and work have to be applied to mitigate international problems. However, their provisions should be used to meet their demands first.
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Atomic energy is becoming more and more popular energy source However some people argue that nuclear power puts life on Earth to danger What is your opinion 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the greatest'.
Suggestion: in the greatest
...tutions should provide support to those in greatest need, others believe they should focus ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'assist'?
Suggestion: assist
...le institution from a developed country assists a developing or underdeveloped one, the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50169491525 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95911817109 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3089161977 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300920104264 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853870809766 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740436211498 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177574105325 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445964780034 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.