Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, there has been a global tendency for young people to change jobs on a frequent basis. It is yet unclear if this practice is beneficial. This essay will go into further detail on why young people switch employment and why this has more disadvantages than advantages.
On the one hand, the aforementioned problem has roots in the fact that the youth are still seeking occupations that suit them. As many are unclear about their work-related desires, they are likely to try numerous occupations to find out their professional interests. It may take months or even years, but once they identify the types of jobs they want to pursue professionally, they can devote themselves to them, making them experts in their field. Another sound explanation is the provision of academic knowledge. Different jobs require specific skills and techniques, which means employees can be equipped with diverse professional skills. Hence, they are able to address one problem more quickly with more creative methods.
On the other hand, despite the above-mentioned virtues of changing jobs, this might hinder one’s career path. The first is that people who change jobs frequently face difficulties in finding new employment. Recruiters typically have a bias against people who frequently switch jobs, as they think those people would not work for their corporations for a long time. They believe that hiring someone who cannot commit to long-term contributions to the firm will be counterproductive. For instance, a friend of mine, who does not have a precise dream career path, determines to keep changing jobs until she finds her passion. However, she ends up unemployed as there is no employer willing to take on someone who might not contribute to the business in the long run.
In conclusion, it seems justifiable for young people to alternate between occupations. However, I contend that the drawbacks are much more substantial since this can impede one’s career opportunities. It is recommended that young people consider their future employment options as early as possible in order to reduce the possibility of job switching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Lee Daisy | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-03 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-03 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Is this a negative or positive development 89
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26979472141 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95526686142 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601173020528 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5798165195 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245451769887 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745441616702 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653057270833 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160558905647 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666590219536 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.