The dynamics of media have changed rampantly over the years. The media coverage directly proportionates the individual life. Many people assert that media coverage of celebrities is having a false effect on children. In my perception, it is a true fact and same will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, from past few decades it has been seen that media industry is growing at wild pace . The sheen of stars and glitterings of limelight change the attitude of an individual. The celebrities live larger than life and henceforth, their stories and controversies attract the children. There are numerous negative impacts on the children. First and the foremost, indulging in a bad activities such as drinking, smoking , consumption of drugs , using faux language etcetera. The stars are characterizing their role in the movies however, innocent children found all the negative stuff very attractive and adopt them in real life. Moreover, in countries like India, the celebrities are considered as incarnation of God and consequently, youth's get influenced immensely. This might result in bad behaviour, scorn toward parents and largely affect the studies. Media itself must understand the seriousness of the issues. Sometimes the rumours of link ups and break ups spread in the society as fire in jungle
Moving further, the stars are in limited relationship these days and the casanova image attracts the individual immensely. Additionally, sometimes celebrities commit severe crime such as rape etcetera. Media has to understand that what they portray directly influence the individual
To recapitulate, I will emphasize that media should focus on the positives of the celebrities rather than portraying the negatives just to grab more viewers to the channel.
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Nowadays,sending children to boarding school is becoming increasingly popular. Some people think that it is beneficial for students to go to private secondary schools. What is the reason? Do you think it is a positive development? 56
- In many countries, the quality of life in the large cities is worsening. What possibly can cause this problem? What measures can be taken to resolve it? 11
- The world of work is changing rapidly employees would not be able to depand on the same job or working condition for a long time in near furture 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t media industry is growing at wild pace . The sheen of stars and glitterings of l...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'activity'?
Suggestion: activity
...st and the foremost, indulging in a bad activities such as drinking, smoking , consumption...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bad activities such as drinking, smoking , consumption of drugs , using faux langu...
^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...drinking, smoking , consumption of drugs , using faux language etcetera. The stars...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, as to, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43525179856 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00170710834 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629496402878 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2697928348 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247915864534 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779095413558 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991965147242 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140300222328 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812489896193 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.