Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that social network websites are adversely affecting each individual as well as the whole community. From my perspective, while it is irrefutable that these sites had numerous negative impacts, the advantages it brings should not be underestimated
On the one hand, there is a variety of adverse effect that social network brings. To begin with, these sites can be quite addictive. There seem to be shreds of evidence that an increasing number of people, especially teenagers, is reported to have excessive usage of the social network. Furthermore, many of them are using social media sites as a means of escaping from reality and keen on living in the virtual world instead of the real one. It may lead to the disproportionate distribution in the workforce which may threaten the prosperity and stability of a nation. In the second place, using social network inappropriately may lead to numerous psychological and physical illnesses. Physically inactive for some time can accelerate the risk of obesity, high blood pressure or even strike. It also resulted in social anxiety or communication degradation as a consequence of being on their own for quite a long time.
Nevertheless, the social network can also associate with various positive impacts on each individual and the whole society. First and foremost, the social network was a brilliant invention when it comes to communication. It is irrefutable that social network sites such as Facebook or Twitter are connecting people and making the world flatter. An illustration of this is that people can effortlessly keep in touch with each other without paying extra international expenses. Another benefit is that it created several new occupations. Social network these days can be considered as a source of entertainment and the famous people on these sites is synonymous with film or music celebrities. Live-streamer, whose workplace is the website specialized in video projection, can be a suitable case in point.
To summarize, the social network may have adverse impacts including addictive and responsible for mental and strength disorders. But its communication convenient and easiness, as well as the merits of job creation, should not be underestimated
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | Baobestfriend | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Anh Olge | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | lalo | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | truong3011 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | truong3011 | 56 | view |
- It s generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist Discuss both these views and give 84
- In many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantages 78
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, such as, as well as, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33521126761 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16082949345 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6005647449 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228307991637 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710315672201 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640722167561 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13744219936 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342699805068 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.