There is diverse opinion regarding sharing information in scientific studies, trading and in educational aspects. Where some say that this is fruitful to doing so, while others think that the key information is a vital source of success in some cases. Both of this view have theire own discussion. Thus prior to my opinion both the sides are explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments proponents put forward, the first one behind distribution of important data is the result is easy by interpretation. All people or organisation in this globe have some kind of crucial data. Some of them are vary essential not only for earning a vast sum of money, but also for eventual achievement of something undiscovered things. Thus, collection of all sorts of information would be a better tommorow. To illustrate In development of Covid-19 vaccine, India and America have taken combinational steps and worked on same formula by exchanging partial detail with each other. Hence, they achieved a result. Moreover, without giving to other we could not expect help when we are in a emergency or need.
However, on the contraray the secret is also admired by a group of thinker on the flip side. Firstly, the consistent effort behind invention of something found imposible for layman. Decades or even centuries of time taken to prepare data, thus by exporting them the huge loss of economy and fame toward society would be found for particular organisation. Furthermore, in educaional perspective, one can not become creative and self confident by relaying on other. Students able to think out of box and search for the all opportunities they have to become a extra-ordinary in their upcomming career.
To sum up and give my opinion, I support the former side to a larger extent as it is very essential in a real life to transfer thoughts with a limitation. However, it will definately discourage pupils who rely on redymade materia and business may loss their identity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...f this view have theire own discussion. Thus prior to my opinion both the sides are ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
... kind of crucial data. Some of them are vary essential not only for earning a vast s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 707, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...we could not expect help when we are in a emergency or need. However, on the co...
^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e all opportunities they have to become a extra-ordinary in their upcomming caree...
^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a and business may loss their identity.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, kind of, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00606060606 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92527694058 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5741217352 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154607483012 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430016860777 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456303335719 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088980831155 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736526312936 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.