Many people believe that we have become a 'disposable' society, throwing things away rather than repairing them and reusing them.
Why do you think that is?
What are some of the possible problems this can cause?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is a popular saying in my childhood that states: "Utilize what is available. Most of the people in many parts of the world feel that our nation has known to be a land of massive waste disposal as people are irresponsible of disposing of garbage properly.
The most obvious reason for improper waste disposal is the following. Many of us have the undesirable mentality of single-use purchases. The attitude of opting that some things are useless or irreversible to repair once use as they can no longer operate to its optimal function. Another reason would be is that people are apparently becoming too lazy to put an effort on repairing or reconstructing junkies as they are much tied up with their busy schedule at work meeting deadlines and reports which hinder them from attending environmental responsibilities. The last reason that can be seen is that some individuals are too keen to use "branded" or "latest" products as the pressure from society dictates to everyone that something should be showing off to the crowd.
To cite a clear example is buying expensive plastic pots from IKEA store where customers can avail it anytime at home via online instead of recycling mineral plastic bottles as traditionally being promoted by environmentalist to help reduce this kind of trash.
There are several problems that will possibly occur if we continue to be unaware of this crisis. The top one alarming effect is environmental pollution due to massive waste disposal. Time will come that garbages will inevitably grow all over the place which will cause various problems for our health and well-being. The second would be the uncontrollable poverty of our society as people keep buying unnecessary products instead of making use of what is readily available. Unwise use of revenues for this material that could likely be preventable if all of us will work together in maximizing the use of recyclable junks.
In conclusion, everyone has a role to play in protecting our environment against degradation. The way how mankind thinks towards waste disposals such as one-time use, vying brand new products and laziness approach could cause a lot of danger in the future thus affecting the environment that leads to the destruction of humanity.
- Most high-level positions in companies are filled by males even though the workforce in many developed countries is made up of more than 50 percent women. Companies should allocate a certain percentage of these positions to females.To what extent do you a 78
- many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment.why is this happening and what measures can be tackle this problem. 96
- In some countries, it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants for their age. Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agr 73
- Many people believe that we have become a disposable society throwing things away rather than repairing them and reusing them Why do you think that is What are some of the possible problems this can cause Give reasons for your answer and include relevant 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t leads to the destruction of humanity.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15053763441 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07702126923 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594086021505 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0793424661 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.733333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214433151571 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647240355963 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414013544229 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100022440587 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689535938715 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.