Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment.
Why is this? What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles?
Nowadays, communities are persistently utilising vehicles despite being cognizant of their negative effects on the environment. In this essay, I would like to identify the causes of this situation and propose some corresponding solutions.
Probably the main factor is the accessibility and comfort of automobiles and motor vehicles. In other words, the possession of a personal vehicle provides availability and convenience for both the passenger and the driver. To exemplify this, when it is required to commute, employees can drive comfortably and peacefully without complying with specific time schedules of the public transportation system. Furthermore, drivers can cover a longer distance in a shorter amount of time because they can control the acceleration and deceleration of their vehicle, hence reaching their desired destination on time. Another contributing factor to this is the fear of the physical condition of public transportation methods, where they’re perceived as dangerous and unreliable. In addition, safety concerns were identified as a barrier to people using public transportation. Stated differently, people fear the criminal behaviour a passenger might commit, such as theft and pickpocketing due to the anonymity, openness and overcrowding of the public transportation system. Consequently, public services and the government find it strenuous to control and monitor such vast systems.
Based on the above reasoning, comprehensive solutions have been identified. The first solution is that the government should invest more in transport infrastructure, to make it more reliable and comfortable for passengers. This can be attained through ameliorating railway systems and initiating more stations in inaccessible areas. Moreover, improve bus services by employing conductors who prevent overcrowding and anti-social behaviour. The next solution is to make cheaper and more standardised fares. Therefore, if ticket prices are reduced, then people will find it more affordable than petrol. The final solution is to encourage people to cycle more since it is not only beneficial for the environment but also an individual’s health. This can be achieved by raising awareness and initiating campaigns about the advantages of cycling in conserving energy and non-renewable resources which are constantly consumed by car drivers. As a result, the public will be motivated to use public transport to commute instead of cars and motorcycles and reduce the rate of harmful emissions.
In conclusion, many people favour the utilization of personal automobiles due to various reasons. So the key is, I believe, to take actions such as improving transport infrastructure, reducing costs and raising awareness of the negative effects of commuting by car and motor vehicles.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam how true do you think this statement is what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 89
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities Do the advantages of information technology outweigh the drawbacks 89
- It is universally accepted that eating too much sugar has negative effects on peoples health Therefore some believe that governments should control the amount of sugar people consume Others think it is the responsibility of an individual to control their 84
- In the twentieth century contact between different parts of the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunications Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75603864734 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30944408119 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0720841908 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.476190476 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61904761905 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210667551031 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511776397482 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404026002477 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108164425807 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309608944643 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.