Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example, the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Currently, a vast majority of animal species have become threatened or critically threatened due to many causes. Nevertheless, some people argue that it is a splurge of currency to protect these animals. Personally, I particularly agree with the idea that is preferable to preserve endangered animals.
On the one hand, if government stop saving extinct animals, and then they can spend this money on developing country. This would lead to strong economic progress and ensure that more money is available to spend on infrastructure and public services. Moreover, another obvious negative effect of protecting threatened animals is that not all creatures are friendly or harmless which can attack people. For instance, tigers or white sharks aredangerous animals. People who lived near this habitat have to face constant threats to their livestock and crops.
On the other hand, there are certainly some advantages to saving endangered animals. First of all, the threatened organism can ruin the ecosystem and rescue biodiversity. It means that all creatures which are part of an ecosystem will encourage natural value. For example, over 50% of medicines currently in use are derived from products made from animals such as the blood of a particular type of horseshoe crab that has been used to detect harmful bacteria in medical derived and dargs. Therefore, endangered animals will create a well-balanced ecosystem that maintains the health of the environment. Another advantage of protecting them is that creatures are also the inspiration for plenty of artwork, music, movies, etc. Their organism play an important role in natural and human life.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that saving animals which face extinction is very important, but it also depends on the economic conditions and development of countries.
- BAR CHART WRITING TASK 1 73
- Some people believe that big multinational companies benefit the host countries Others argue that they are harmful to the economies of developing countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Wrting task 1 11
- Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42807017544 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89678821519 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.231814173 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172675240712 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516445635671 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341502558693 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994803729462 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373275363103 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.