Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, galvanizing more people to attend vocational courses has been in the limelight of the public. While nobody can deny the necessity of learning academic knowledge, I thoroughly agree that we should stimulate more people to follow vocational training such as electrician, plumbers and other trades.
There are a handful of reasons why more skilled workers must be trained. First, since qualified workers such as electricians, plumbers and constructors are vital for building landmarks or upgrading infrastructure, we should convince people to attend more practical training. In fact, only trained workers can ensure the safe construction of public buildings such as hospital, schools or museum. Second, if people solely concentrated on academic courses, the labor network would be imbalanced, resulting in graduate unemployment. For example, many top-ranked countries, particularly The United State, Australia, Canada, England, have imported trained workers from developing countries to meet the society’s need as local people tend to do office jobs and follow researching study.
Besides, there are some measures must be considered to make everyone involve in vocational courses. The first step, in order to help students acquire hands-on skills, schools need to organize a variety of workshops or competitions about hands-on works. This means that students can apply the theory of physics lessons to practical applications before graduation, which boosts their work efficiency and productivity later on. The second solution, parents should entice their children to choose vocational careers by explaining the good employment prospects and remuneration for workers that are trained.
In conclusion, with these convincing arguments, I advocate for inducing more people to attend vocational training because a society cannot function effectively without qualified employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | vevinawynn | 61 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...mbers and other trades. There are a handful of reasons why more skilled workers mus...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90545454545 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98160974881 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658181818182 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4050014337 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356304322148 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113209566146 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750638188663 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204783122088 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894379664819 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
...mbers and other trades. There are a handful of reasons why more skilled workers mus...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90545454545 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98160974881 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658181818182 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4050014337 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356304322148 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113209566146 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750638188663 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204783122088 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894379664819 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.