many people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programmes. Instead they get news about the world from the Internet. Is this a positive or a negative development ?.
Nowadays, owning to the startling pace advancement of the technology, people can get approach to news around the world as fast as possible. Therefore, many individuals are prone to use the Internet to gain updates in lieu of reading printed articles or watching TV news programmes. From my perspective, this tendency might have some unfavorable bearings.
On the one hand, there are some factors contributing to the prevalence of this trend. The most fundamental justification is that the Internet can contain a wider range of news compared to newspaper. For example, when searching on Google about the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine , there are thousands of apps emerged. As a result, news seekers have a lot of choices to read information relating to this topic. Furthermore, it can be time-saving to access to news via the Internet. To illustrate, it can take a person who is keen on using newspapers about 2 or 3 days to approach to the latest information as he has to wait for the journals to be printed and distributed. However, he only needs to spend a few second having the news appear in case he leverages the Internet.
On the other hand, a vast array of reasons have prevailed me on believing that this trend might be ominous in some aspects. Firstly, information containing in newspapers can be formal and very reliable compared to that on the Internet or some other apps because before being distributed, journals have to be verified deliberately by publishers. For instance, during Covid-19 pandemic in Vietnam, some people were penalized by the authorities since they had posted wrong news about the pandemic, which caused confusion among many inhabitants. Secondly, spending too much time on reading online news through electrical devices like smartphones or laptops may be hazardous to the eyes of users because some studies have proved that the green light emitted from these machines can trigger some optical ilnesses like short-sightedness or long-sightedness. Thus, the less time people get access to online updates, the healthier their eyes are.
In conclusion, apparently, reading news via the Internet instead of using newspapers or TV news programmes can be auspicious in terms of satisfying the demands of humans in this modern civilisation, I would think that this trend might be fraught with a lot of pitfalls.
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting and they are best at Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans 78
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tary conflict between Russia and Ukraine , there are thousands of apps emerged. As...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00043398474 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561038961039 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2440205 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271505233008 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861865335638 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054933101689 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187344643292 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528299971538 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.