Many people nowadays have more than one job at the same time What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Many people nowadays have more than one job at the same time. What are the reasons?
Is it a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, employees tend to gravitate towards working in distinct firms in the same period of their working life. Additionally, there are various compelling triggers explaining the soar of workforce working in more than one company and I strongly opine that the drawbacks of this phenomenon is overshadowing its advantageous sides.

It is interesting to note that having more than one career at the same time helps people to undergo financial difficulties. From working in several environments, they can enhance not only the skills set of recent fields but also the salary that they are paid, which can cater for either bills or shopping demands. For example, those who are contributing for only one firm are unable to stand chances of having high wages per month compared to the other trying to make ends meet by doing different jobs at once. Moreover, with the abilities of working in many firms, they can easily climb to higher positions in numerous working places and that is the time when the money starts rolling in. This tendency of contemporary people worldwide plays an integral part in tackling the budget deficit of so many workforces, leading to the thriving economy for both citizens and governments.

One school of thought argues that we can earn a bunch of profits from working over one company at the same time, but probably the adverse bearings are more outstanding than their counterparts. For one, the distinguishable ways can not be identified by those who followed this trend. Particularly, if people are working in numerous environments, they can reach the peak in their career path, for example, being a chairman of a gigantic commercial group. Furthermore, the employee benefits of them can be extremely demolished by a particular company inasmuch as the contribution in distinct firms, which the authorities easily spot. Last but not least, their well-being will be overwhelmingly affected by this trend, leading to the distribution of working quality, and as a result, they may be eliminated by all of the working places that they currently dedicate.

In conclusion, working in many firms at a similar time is a great way to have a new opportunity and high wages per month, while the great influence of this tendency can not be denied.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-17 HaMyP2003 56 view
2022-11-20 NSMDeadshot0411 84 view
2022-08-29 khoapham 78 view
2022-08-29 khoapham 78 view
2022-08-29 khoapham 78 view
Essays by user khoapham :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... overshadowing its advantageous sides. It is interesting to note that having mo...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omy for both citizens and governments. One school of thought argues that we can...
^^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... as a result, they may be eliminated by all of the working places that they currently dedi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g places that they currently dedicate. In conclusion, working in many firms at ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88013591281 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548128342246 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1567929978 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.384615385 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7692307692 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206595221121 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849818421648 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948052952174 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129978562712 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548660417283 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.