Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
It is true that in some countries people prefer foreign films rather than native ones. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and in my opinion governments should promote local film-making by subsidizing the industry.
There are various reasons why people find foreign films more absorbing than the films that are produced in their countries. Firstly, there are huge budgets in certain countries which are spent to make visual effects, fanciful action, fantastic music, shoot scenes in spectacular locations and also to use high technologies. Hollywood blockbuster like ‘Game of thrones’ or the James bond films are examples of such productions. Secondly, these films are made by reputed actors and actresses are star and these films are made by the highly accomplished producers and directors that would attract people to them. Third, foreign films have more genres such as science fiction, supernatural, psychological thriller and so on…. The other reason is, people can learn foreign languages and improve their skills, for example watching ‘Friends’ is a good source of learning English and popular entertainment by many people in IRAN.
In my opinion governments should support local film industries financially. In every country there may be talented film makers who just need to be given the opportunity to prove themselves. By investing money in local film industry, local film makers can provide equipment for making high quality films and get the chance to be seen. Because some Movies are reflection of culture and customs in society; with making good films we can export our movies to overseas and perhaps even get a rise in tourist numbers. Also to teach social skills to people movies are an effective way in the society. If governments help with film-making costs, they will see the increase in employment in the film industry and incomes from film sales.
In conclusion, I believe that increased financial support could help to raise the quality of locally made films, and consequently the listeners, and eventually it could be a source of income for the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-28 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lm-making by subsidizing the industry. There are various reasons why people fin...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... entertainment by many people in IRAN. In my opinion governments should support...
^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...aps even get a rise in tourist numbers. Also to teach social skills to people movies...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26548672566 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83788383067 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3387966559 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496225079986 0.244688304435 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162479643623 0.084324248473 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109588011632 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290280559705 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087176514498 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.