Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problem?
Wealth inequality has been receiving endless public attention and criticisms from academia, in both developed and developing nations. Although problems associated with this situation can be pronounced, they are not without solutions. There are a number of problems caused by wealth inequality. First, wealth inequality widens the gaps among different social classes, meaning different treatments for different social classes will likely ensue. For example, youthful upper-class members can attend prominent preparatory schools, which open doors not only to such elite universities but also to the universities’ highly exclusive clubs whereas lower-class ones do not possess the same opportunities. Second, since the rich possess most of the wealth, they have the power to manipulate politicians to enact policies in favor of them at the expense of other social classes. For instance, recent evidence suggests that Wall Street banks have gotten even richer with policies made by the US government. Nevertheless, there have been many good solutions for wealth inequality. First, since the rich cannot spend all their money, imposing higher taxes on the rich would not disrupt their lifestyles much and still substantially increase the tax revenue to assist the less fortunate. The revenue collected can be spent to build and improve educational institutions and grant scholarships or bursaries to poorer students, giving them equal opportunities to succeed. Second, wealth inequality can be caused by tax loopholes that the rich are taking advantage of. Therefore, the key to solving this issue is to close as many loopholes as possible so that it is more fair for the poor and middle class. In conclusion, although wealth inequality can cause a whole host of social issues, there are still many practical solutions. By adjusting tax policies alone, governments can be a decent contributor to a fairer society
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | mohsina | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | xbear307 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | vongocson | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | quynhan1995 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 61 | view |
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problem? 61
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problem? 56
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to broadcast foreign films and TV shows Others however think it is best to produce local films and shows Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to broadcastforeign films and TV shows. Others, however, think it is best to producelocal films and shows. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree ? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50680272109 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94246783981 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1681445532 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141181714851 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054061958376 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417831270297 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141181714851 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.