Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
Concerning the issue of the rapid development of technology, it is widely believed that the communication technology inventions nowadays are having several bad impact on people's relationship with others. As far as I am concerned, I do partially agree with this point of view due to some reasons below.
First of all, it can be said with certainty that modern technology prevents people from meeting others face-to-face. This is due to the fact that thanks to some social networks, people these days can interact to their friends and relatives or contact to others all over the world easily. Second of all, a subsequent factor could be because individuals nowadays spend lots of their pleisure time on using their phones. For example, in Vietnam, some researches show that the citizens waste about a third of their free time surfing webs, watching online videos or playing online games.
In contrast, it must be admitted that the modern communication technology also has several advantages on social relationships. Firstly, these apps provide people a wide range ways of keeping others in touch. For instance, people can make a phone call to their families in the rest part of the earth or chat with their friends whenever they have free time. Moreover, online meetings and work-from-home are efficient way for companies to save a great deal of money on facilities and services for their employees.
Taking everything into consideration, people have to weigh up in their thoughts to what extent this issue should be supported. However, the discussions are convincing enough to lead me to the conclusion that people should try all their best to maintain their social relationships instead of depending on the latest technologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | quang31012004 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, so, third, for example, for instance, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16725978648 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86939128826 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604982206406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.352728004 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199082530012 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762200050017 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544650762619 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129743008123 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464792879973 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.