Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

“Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?”

Nowadays, technology is considered helpful in the modern world because of its convenience and modernity in our lives. However, some individuals believe that modern communication has a negative impact on social relationships. While it is undeniable that technology does bring about some disadvantages, I strongly believe that its benefits outweigh its drawbacks.
One of the disadvantages of technological communication is that it decreases the users’ social skills. According to supporters of this view, since people become more dependent on technology, they will gradually narrow their connection down to virtual conversations and neglect real-life interactions, leading to the degradation of societal etiquettes and rifts in personal relationships. With the convenience of new high-tech communication devices such as smartphones and chatting applications like Skype, Viber, or Facebook, users may no longer have a demand for face-to-face communication, which is a big drawback that modern technology has.
Despite its unavoidable downsides, it is obvious that developments in communication technology have provided people with significant benefits. First of all, modern technological innovations save time for users when it comes to communication purposes. Instead of having to wait for days for a letter to be delivered, people can now conveniently send messages within seconds by using email or Messenger. Additionally, people can also broaden their social relationships thanks to modern applications. With social networks like Twitter or Instagram, users can connect with others with the same interests and make friends worldwide. Moreover, communication technology helps address the difficulties in long-distance relationships. People in different regions can contact effortlessly through virtual connections with Facetime or Skype.
All in all, even though it is doubtless that modern communication does have some disadvantages, its advantages of contributing to how we manage our social relationships have undoubtedly outshadowed said negativity.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-27 Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy 78 view
2022-04-16 Yamin_j 61 view
2022-01-01 quang31012004 67 view
2021-11-25 besuxinh 89 view
2021-11-25 besuxinh 89 view
Essays by user Thuc Linh Dinh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08591065292 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54063639651 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8344269618 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300068235512 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112433097317 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066283012829 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185437988738 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030489442822 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.