Many people think that regional bonus points in Vietnamese national high school examination
increase the required admission points of many universities and deprive students from large cities of
entering top universities because of not having this priviledge.
Discuss this opinion. What do you think Vietnamese educational authorities should do to achieve the
equality in education between rural students and metropolitan students? Give reasons and specific
examples to support your opinion(s).
In national high school exam in Vietnam, territorial additional points are widely thought to be the reason by which universities’ admission point is proliferated; therefore, it is thought that this inequality would take urban students’ chance of attending highest ranked colleges. From my perspective, this privilege of rural area students is commonsensical and that Vietnamese government change the calculation of the priority score to create fairness for the contestants is of sagaciousness.
On the one hand, the rationality of the above-mentioned policy derives from the difference in the learning facilities and financial status between metropolitan students and rural ones. To begin with, academic learners from less developed countryside suffer from various incommodities that are uncustomary to children in urban area ranging from insufficient studying amenities to substandard educators. For instance, while studying in a fully-furnished classroom consisting air conditionals and projectors is casual to downtown students, their peers in mountainous areas find having adequate food is luxurious, let alone a modernized place of study. Secondly, distinctiveness in socio-economic conditions between citizens and ethnic minorities also acts as a hindrance to the studying career of the latter. Explicitly, shortage of money to pay for extended classes would undoubtedly results in inadequacy of necessary knowledge to gain high scores in examinations. Thus, the priority policy is decent.
On the other hand, educational priorities in Vietnam should alter the plus score in national high school examination. In this day and age, it is evident that the socio-economic status of the countryside in Vietnam has rapidly ameliorated which by all means narrows the difference in the living standards between children from here and ones in metropolis. Therefore, adding overabundant bonus points to the answer sheet of rural students might create such an inequality in the enrollment to the top-ranked colleges. Besides, the regional bonus point is widely believed to be to blame for the escalation of admission points of a variety of universities, which deprive pupils not having the privilege from entering their aspiring fields. To give in detail, the benchmark for enrolling in faculty of IT in Hanoi University of Science and Technology has risen up to 28,05 points, in other words, each of the subjects should be at least 9.25 points, an arduous goal to achieve.
To sum up, although the priority policy is humane, these bonus scores is no longer appropriate with respect to the current situation in countryside. Therefore, it is highly recommended that Vietnamese government make some alterations in the calculation of these plus points.
- me businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills 84
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes again when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problems 89
- WRITE A SURVEY REPORT ON STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING IN ONE SPECIFIC SUBJECT COURSE 67
- Many people think that regional bonus points in Vietnamese national high school examination increase the required admission points of many universities and deprive students from large cities of entering top universities because of not having this priviled 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the incre 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 883, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
... for extended classes would undoubtedly results in inadequacy of necessary knowledge to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tandards between children from here and ones in metropolis. Therefore, adding overab...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for instance, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66105769231 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26098720282 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8478612789 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227872945768 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657772919009 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675007216981 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134894175361 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831432140748 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.