me businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills
Recently, some newly-hired staffs have been dispraised for their deficiency of communicative kills, namely teamwork. From my point of view, this phenomenon derives from not only the design of modern workplace but also the excessive use of technological gadgets.
First and foremost, the insufficiency of interpersonal
skill is thought to be accredited to the amenity of employee’s workplace, whose quality is being sacrificed for quantity. Indeed, as an conglomerate develops, there is usually a tendency in it to divide their workers into separate spaces and cubicles, in which the tasks given to each members is surprisingly irrelevant to that of the others. Secondly, that methodological gizmos and online communication platforms have been broadly utilized for daily chatting has deteriorated interpersonal skill. To be more specific, these latest technology has made face-to-face contact and verbal communication redundant; therefore, employee’s impartible adroitness would undoubtedly fall short of standard.
Though the problems above are prevalent, they can be overcomed by conducting further viva voce training programme for new recruits on team endeavors. Having attended these campaigns, not only might the employees develop verbal skills but also be acknowledge the value of teamwork. Another solution which can be applied would be to promote digital well-being which educates staffs how to harness modern gadgets in a moderate manner. Last but not least, providing the workplace with more public space where staffs could interfacing with each other might be a remedy to rectify the aforementioned issues.
By and large, misuse of technological devices and false design of offices are the two core reasons for the lack of interpersonal skills of employees; however these problems could be alleviated by taking the above said methods.
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes again when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problems 89
- WRITE A SURVEY REPORT ON STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING IN ONE SPECIFIC SUBJECT COURSE 67
- Many people think that regional bonus points in Vietnamese national high school examination increase the required admission points of many universities and deprive students from large cities of entering top universities because of not having this priviled 73
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- me businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most, the insufficiency of interpersonal skill is thought to be accredited to the...
^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ing sacrificed for quantity. Indeed, as an conglomerate develops, there is usually...
^^
Line 6, column 411, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a moderate manner" with adverb for "moderate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...es staffs how to harness modern gadgets in a moderate manner. Last but not least, providing the work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 519, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'interface'
Suggestion: interface
...th more public space where staffs could interfacing with each other might be a remedy to re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72924187726 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13463024339 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649819494585 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9518375457 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.272727273 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140013934292 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552451457495 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518201885588 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799252851495 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404734261493 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.