Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households.
What problems are caused by household waste?
What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term?
The sizeable amount of modern domestic waste is worrying as it is causing a range of issues. These, along with possible temporary and long-lasting measurements, will be presented in the following essay.
It is true that as large quantities of waste are released from households, environmental pollution is further exacerbated through a number of ways. The most immediate is the consequential impediment on social efforts to promote sustainable classification and recycling. This could be attributed to the inherent complex nature of sorting household waste, which encompasses varying materials from metals, paper to plastic and is now becoming more burgeoning due to the increase in volumes. As the effectiveness of treating waste is compromised, levels of pollution are likely to rise. For instance, piling trash in landfills is not only occupying useable land and a prominent source of greenhouse gas emission upon incineration but also a threat to wildlife. Animals like birds may mistakenly ingest indigestible items and perish for not being able to take in actual nutritious food.
Considering these problems, several solutions are in sight. Temporary remedies centralize around devising a comprehensive scheme to process larger and diverse amounts of waste. Suggestively, this may include erecting more waste-treating facilities that are equipped with specialized machinery such as conveyor belts and magnetic separation. For a long term transformation, however, a change in people’s lifestyles, with a strong emphasis on environmentally friendly practices, is prerequisite. This could be done by encouraging households to utilize more durable or biodegradable items in place of single-use ones and turning certain decomposable items into fertilizers.
In brief, large volumes of household waste impinge upon our life in various ways, dampening efforts for waste treatment and worsening environmental pollution. While immediate solutions call for higher efficiency in waste-treating plants, long-lasting measures are rooted in making people’s practices more sustainable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-19 | Quân Lê 2020 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in decomposable items into fertilizers. In brief, large volumes of household was...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng people’s practices more sustainable.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in brief, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90429042904 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36105519821 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663366336634 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0347992893 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.266666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238073308843 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068510901268 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047236187096 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145556163023 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329647933126 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.