Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term
The sizeable amount of domestic waste has become a major concern. As will be shown in the following essay, such a considerable quantity causes a range of problems in relation to our progress in environmental maintenance and requires both immediate and long-lasting remedies.
The worrying rate of waste produced and disposed by households has repercussions. Forefront among them is the hindrance that is placed on our effort to classify waste to maximize recycling and reusing. As materials used in households are inherently diverse, a huge volume of waste can overload the current treating capacity of plants. This lack of effective sorting is inextricably linked with the worsening of environmental pollution. For instance, left scattered around landfills, plastic items such as bags and bottle caps may be mistaken by birds as food. Upon ingestion and accumulation of these objects, the creatures will eventually perish, having no space in their body for actual food.
Having examined the aforementioned issues, it is imperative that proper measures are taken. The temporary solution revolves around upgrading waste treatment plants and heightening their efficiency. This could be realized with the introduction of more powerful machines and technologies for waste classification, such as magnetic conveyor belts and light-based waste separators. For a more fundamental and long-term transformation, however, efforts aiming at changing public awareness and practice are of paramount importance and should present in many spheres of life. As an example, at school, students should learn how to sort their own trash at home while durable, reusable plastics ought to be sold in place of their single-use counterparts.
In brief, increasing household waste is held accountable for dampening our progress in controlling pollution. Thus, it necessitates both urgent measures of upgrading our infrastructures for waste treating and a gradual, profound transformation in civilians’ lifestyle towards one that is more sustainable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-19 | Quân Lê 2020 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that students in high or secondary school can choose courses freely others think that courses such as mathematics must be compulsory Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 747, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...place of their single-use counterparts. In brief, increasing household waste is ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72607260726 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24873531866 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633663366337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.788075495 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235964737756 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758143233122 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658861988977 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136511162023 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207979827486 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.