Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both view and include your opinion, supported by examples.
From the past to now, sporting events regularly are followed by sporting fans. Because of the enthusiastic support of spectators over the world, a lot of nations compete with each other to become a host. Although there are a variety of benefits, I believe that drawbacks to the host are more obvious.
It is evident that the home country will benefit from organizing big sporting festivals. Firstly, economy of this nation will develop better. Each sporting event can sell millions of plane tickets. For instance, Summer Olympic 2016 had sold two millions tickets before this sporting event occurred, and the price of tickets is from 11.5 USD to 1,318 USD. Secondly, tourist destinations will attract a lot of visitors. When certain nation becomes a host, the image of this country will be advertised on the internet, newspapers and TV. As a result, people will be curious about this country, and they can travel here or after finishing festivals, they will be here for some days to visit this place. Finally, the government of host country has to invest money on building infrastructures so that it can serve for sporting purposes well, and after that, its residents can also use it for their life.
In spite of these arguments, I assume that the host has to suffer a lot of drawbacks from these events. Initially, the environment is polluted seriously. On sporting days, the number of people of host country increases, so there are a lot of transports on highways and railway. As a result, carbon emission rises significantly. Moreover, there are a lot of trash left after festival finishes, and the government has to invest a lot of money to collect them. Besides, it is easy for being in debt as host finances a lot of money to build and prepare for the festival. The government needs to erect more enormous museums, equip modern tools for competitions as well as conduct infrastructures such as streets and hotels. For example, Greece had to suffer the large amount of debt, particularly 50,000 euros and it spent 36 years returning a sum of money. Last but not least, some infrastructures cannot serve locals after the festival finishes. It is so wasteful and useless. For instance, some places built to serve for mountain biking competition, but after that, they are not made use of reasonably. Therefore, they are destroyed day by day.
In conclusion, although sporting events bring positive signals for host countries, I convinced that the drawbacks are more serious. In the future, sports will be more and more expanded, and hosts have to set better strategies to limit disadvantages.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Other however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that competitive sports are important in children s study whereas some believe that it is not useful as children feel that it is the only competition and winning Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Discuss both view and include your opinion supported by examples 56
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 92
- International travel has become a very popular choice of tourists worldwide it also has some influences on the host country Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94965675057 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76871228957 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524027459954 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2096860922 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.52 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.48 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188463937963 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557588531858 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639008790429 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152352535453 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681050964984 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.