Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
It is apparent that a substantial percentage of young learners are struggling to pay close attention at school. This essay will discuss how portable devices and an overloaded curriculum are the driving forces and suggest some resolutions, including restricting screen time and improving their well-being.
Firstly, this lack of attention in class could be attributed to the ubiquitous nature of technology and electronic products, especially smartphones. In other words, teenagers get into the habit of using them even when attending classes owing to irresistible temptations from technology. A prime example of this is online gaming, which can result in a situation where they are forced to multitask to play games while listening to their lecture. Another factor giving rise to this phenomenon is that students are overwhelmed by such a heavy curriculum. When students are faced with a large and intricate amount of work, it can be more difficult than ever for them to concentrate and absorb knowledge. This can incentivize feelings of frustration, anxiety, and burnout, which can further impact their ability to focus.
One urgent measure that could be taken to confront this problem is to restrict the use of digital devices for inappropriate purposes. Since they are a double-edged sword, a complete ban on them might be counterproductive and have resultant consequences. It is advised that the school board control their presence during class hours and remind students to disable notifications. Moreover, the mental and physical health of adolescents should be enhanced by providing support and resources to help them relieve stress levels and manage their workload. For example, a consulting office where they are able to receive advice and confess can be established.
In conclusion, difficulties in focusing are mainly due to portable devices and a heavy syllabus. In order to tackle this issue, schools can implement measures such as restricting screen time and improving student well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- It s okay to lie online 56
- It s okay to lie online 56
- It s okay to lie online 56
- It is reckoned that making mistakes is inevitable and can be a valuable growth experience for teenagers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time and improving student well-being.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43769968051 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04779271125 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623003194888 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5235293844 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19520093809 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585651569373 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504381011911 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109308560106 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234957522186 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time and improving student well-being.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43769968051 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04779271125 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623003194888 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5235293844 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19520093809 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585651569373 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504381011911 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109308560106 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234957522186 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.