In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-to-
face meetings. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Due to the advancements in science and technology, people now have various ways to communicate instead of physical ones. Some people, however, consider this not wholly advantageous. This essay will look at both sides of this issue.
First, online communication is cost-effective in every possible way as compared to the traditional method. A web conference is a good example. To attend a physical conference, not only does one have to spend money on travel, but also the cost of food and lodging are included, along with other expenses. Whereas, with an online video conference, all you need is a computer or a mobile phone that has a working internet connection. Besides, this is a convenient and easy method of contacting each other. For example, Zoom is a popular app. Through it, users can join a conference from their living room, or bedroom, or from wherever they want to. Users do not have to travel anywhere or book a hotel in any city just to attend a physical conference. In this way, people can also save time, which is one of the most valuable factors in the modern world.
On the other hand, it is not necessary to eliminate face-to-face communication from our world. Because meeting in person is key in building crucial relationships. For example, a survey conducted by ABC University in Germany found that almost 100% of people say this direct communication is essential for long-term business connections. This communication allows you to better read hand gestures, body language, and facial expressions. As a result, it makes for effective communication.
To summarize, despite the fact that there are several negatives to online communication, I believe the advantages of this method outweigh the disadvantages.
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive 78
- More and more people are seriously overweight Some people suggest the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will look at both sides of this issue. First, online communication is cost-effe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... valuable factors in the modern world. On the other hand, it is not necessary t...
^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e-to-face communication from our world. Because meeting in person is key in building cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it makes for effective communication. To summarize, despite the fact that ther...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his method outweigh the disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, look, so, whereas, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13732394366 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08399852712 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640845070423 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.64544832 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0555555556 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19350613821 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514544594958 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518309759512 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120287009093 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383108529401 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.