Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries.
What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
In recent times, the sphere of entertainment has gained exponential ubiquity. Thus, more individuals are gravitating towards finding out about the personal life of celebrities or singers rather than that of prominent figures or leaders of a revolution in the past. In this essay, the reasons for this notion will be elucidated before suggesting any medium to arise people’s interests and curiosities for those salient historical figures.
To begin with, a major reason why youngsters are likely to be drawn to celebrities’ personal business is courtesy of social media. It is undeniable that those online platforms promote publicity and perfection, therefore, when the young see an influencer or a celebrity’s post depicting their lavishing and debauchery lifestyle, they might develop a sense of admiration for the brush-up and filtered life of those famous individuals. In addition, it is notable that nowadays, at a click of a button, people are exposed to a ubiquitous number of online articles dedicating to the personal businesses of notorious people or celebrities which significantly outnumber those about historical figures or the plights and predicaments of people during wartime. To mitigate this, it is the media’s responsibility to post articles relating to those brave individuals. In that way, youngsters could accumulate a deeper understanding of the past and broaden their horizons.
Additionally, unengaging history lessons at school are partly contributed to students’ lack of interest in this subject. For example, students are asked to remember historical dates and events without having any conspicuous explanation for their importance. Furthermore, with subpar illustrations, textbooks in use might not be able to gain students’ attention. Hence, the way forward might be to increase the importance of teacher’s emotions when delivering historical knowledge for students as well as integrate more illustrative pictures or videos for better profound lessons.
In conclusion, social media and the wrong teaching methods could change the young generation’s perspective about learning history and prominent historical figures, however, with careful choices of posting articles and teacher’s emotions added in when teaching, students will soon regain their curiosities for famous people in history.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20824656795 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9065131063 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.923076923 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179877578774 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533265761428 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666482625525 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113676574737 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525637010052 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.